Operation HUSKY, Invasion of Sicily, July 1943.

Photograph NA4065. Troops embarking into landing craft at Tripoli for
the invasion of Sicily, 3 July 1943. Photo Credit - Lt. Chetwyn*, No. 2
Army Film and Photographic Unit, and Imperial War Museum (IWM).
* Correction (see reader's comment below)! Somebody goofed! After 8 years of neglect, the blackened caption should read "Troops Embark at Malta for Forthcoming Offensive," 09.07.1943. And "Photo by Lt. Deakin."
Why? Please note: The reverse side of photo NA 4065 found at IWM says the troops are embarking 'AT MALTA', not Tripoli. As well, the details typed on the back of each of Lt. Deakin's photos that are found in a short series (NA4064 - NA4070) are identical, i.e., "Troops Embark At Malta" and "51st Highland Div. Malta," and "Taken by Lt. Deakin."
Credit: Reverse side of NA4065 found at Imperial War Museum
That being said, a few questions might still be raised re the series. E.g., the first photo in the series is stamped "Released" with "Censored" crossed out. The second, NA4065, has "Passed as Censored" stamped on the back. The rest are stamped "Released." So, they didn't all stand as equal in the eyes of censors? Why the different stamps? Was it because the wrong caption, photographer and location had been spotted by a censor? I would say, likely.
And on each photo the words "At Malta" are underlined and the word 'STET' appears. Latin for 'let it stand' I believe (according to Google : ) Which makes me wonder if the caption by Lt. Chetwyn was spotted as a mistake at some point but it was then too late to fix the problem. Is there more to it than that, or was it likely a small fumble, what with 1000s upon 1000s of WWII photos to be dealt with when IMW, for example, started to organize them all into some sense of order?
(Help Wanted. Opinions are welcomed here. If you feel you know why the wrong caption was placed in the Deakin series, please let me know.)
Comments and questions can be sent to me at gordh7700@gmail.com
Introduction:
Before the invasion of Sicily in July 1943, most Canadians assigned to man landing crafts travelled around the African continent. My father did so on SS Silver Walnut, and though the ship had to make numerous stops for repairs in African ports - Cape Town, Durban - it arrived in Port Said in late June.
Before the invasion of Sicily in July 1943, most Canadians assigned to man landing crafts travelled around the African continent. My father did so on SS Silver Walnut, and though the ship had to make numerous stops for repairs in African ports - Cape Town, Durban - it arrived in Port Said in late June.
In early July a large armada of Allied ships left the shores of North Africa, bound first for Malta, then D-Day Sicily on the 10th.
About the invasion of Sicily, Lloyd Evans, a member of RCNVR and Combined Operations (and the 80th or 81st Canadian Flotillas of landing craft) writes:
The next day we sailed in fairly heavy seas and, as usual, for an unknown destination. A few days later we were given a booklet describing Sicily. That night we unloaded the landing craft in exceptionally heavy seas - Operation Husky, the invasion of Sicily, was on.
The initial landing was fairly quiet but later heavy enemy artillery opened up. This was quickly silenced by a few salvos from the 16-inch guns of a supporting Monitor. This particular Monitor was one of two shallow draft Cruisers that had been built for bombardment duties in the China seas. It had been fitted with large blisters on the sides, a kind of sacrificial layer, to reduce damage from a torpedo attack.
An hour or two into the landing enemy planes started bombing the beach area. It was very intensive in the first 24 hours with nearly thirty raids but continued for several days at less intensive levels. The first of the raids each day were a regular wake up call in the mornings!
By the water's edge and beach area there were several crashed American gliders which had been cut loose too early and failed to reach their designated landing zones. They still had bodies in them. After several days of almost continuous bombing our ship ran low of 20 mm Oerlikon A.A. ammunition. Such was the intensity of the firing that the gun barrels overheated and were replaced by the guns crews. Until our ship received fresh supplies of ammunition we only fired in self defence of a direct attack on our ship.
While all this bombing was hard on the nerves it didn’t accomplish very much. However about noon one day, three Stuka dive bombers came screaming from behind the mountain and out of the sun. They dropped three bombs hitting two ships directly and damaging another from a near miss. For a few hours the black smoke from the exploding ships turned day into night.
While all this bombing was hard on the nerves it didn’t accomplish very much. However about noon one day, three Stuka dive bombers came screaming from behind the mountain and out of the sun. They dropped three bombs hitting two ships directly and damaging another from a near miss. For a few hours the black smoke from the exploding ships turned day into night.
On another occasion, during a heavy bombing attack, a hospital ship lying off our beach, was sunk. Hundreds of bombs were dropped at this time on the numerous ships around the beach so the incident might have been accidental. After a Canadian Spitfire squadron became operational from a nearby grass runway there was a big reduction in enemy air activity.
The above excerpt is from LIFE ON A WW2 LANDING CRAFT, as found at www.combinedops.com, a scholarly website - worthy of lengthy visits! - developed and maintained by Scotsman Geoff Slee.
Many excellent photographs - revealing troop carriers in convoy, flotillas of landing craft, beach landings and subsequent Allied action in Sicily are part of a vast collection belonging to the Imperial War Museum, U.K.
Several RN and U.S. photographers worked aboard airplanes (see top photo), troop ships, landing craft and on the beaches creating valuable still photographs and newsreels that inform us of many details pertaining to the invasion. I encourage readers to browse IWM collections at their leisure. Copies of rare photographs can be purchased, if desired.
Please link to IWM at Search Our Collections.
Displayed below are a few pictures taken by photographers during World War 2. They are now archived at IWM and may assist those searching for more information about the role of Canadians in Combined Operations - and many other divisions, regiments, etc. - during Operation HUSKY.
The captions that accompany the photographs are provided by IWM as well:
The captions that accompany the photographs are provided by IWM as well:
E25716. Men of the Durham Light Infantry board a 'Z' craft at an Egyptian
port to be transported to a ship bound for Sicily, 12 July 1943.
Photo Credit - Sgt. Travis, No. 1 Army F & P Unit, IWM.
A17945. Operation Husky: The Sicily Landings 9-10 July 1943: A small section
of the vast armada of ships which took part in the invasion of Sicily as photographed
from landing ship headquarters HILARY at dawn of the first day of the invasion
of the island. Lt. H.A. Mason, RN Photographer, and IWM.
A17956. Operation Husky: Scene in the early morning as the invasion fleet
closed in to land troops, tanks and guns during the start of the invasion of Sicily.
In the distance smoke is rising up from what appears to be a landing craft on fire.
While in the foreground, HMS GLENGYLE a Landing Ship (Infantry) lowers
a LCVP during the operation. Lt. H.A. Mason and IWM.
A17906. A view from the bridge of HMS ALYNBANK as she approached
Pachino, Sicily. The ship in the background may well be the KEREN*.
Lt. E.E. Allen, Royal Navy Official Photographer and IWM
*Editor: HMS Keren was one of the many ships that carried troops around Africa on its way to Operation Husky. It also carried Canadians who were members of RCNVR, Combined Operations and 80th or 81st Canadian Flotillas of landing craft, men trained to carry troops and materials of war to shore in Sicily. Below are some of the Canadians aboard Keren, while in the Atlantic Ocean:
Note Don Westbrook, back row, first on left. Photo - Doug Harrison
Canadians at HMS Saunders, Egypt. circa June, 1943
Note Don Westbrook, back row, fourth from left.
Photo - Doug Harrison
A18099. A late evening picture of the fast convoy of big ships stretching
across the horizon, carrying the men who made the initial assault, approaching
Sicily. Photograph taken on destroyer HMS NUBIAN. Lt. F.G. Roper, IWM.
NY 730. Operation Husky: American soldiers drive a US army scout car from a
landing craft onto the beach at Licata while under fire. The U.S. sector attracted the
first and severest Axis counter attacks. U.S. Embassy WW2 Photo Library, at IWM.
A17907. A loaded landing craft tank (LCT 412) taking Royal Air Force personnel
to the Sicilian shores near Pachino during the invasion of the island.
Lt. E.E. Allen, Royal Navy Official Photographer, IWM.
NA4275. Troops wade ashore from landing ships, 10 July 1943.
Credit - Sgt. Stubbs, No. 2 Army F & P Unit, and IWM.
NA4635. General view of one of the invasion beaches, with Italian prisoners being
made to remove barbed-wire in the foreground, 9 July 1943.*
Photo - Sgt. Loughlin, No. 2 Army F & P Unit, and IWM.
*I now believe the above photo is of GEORGE Beach, where members of the 80th Flotilla of Canadian LCMs - including my father LS Gordon Douglas ("Doug") Harrison RCNVR/Combined Ops - served for 4 - 5 weeks, July 10 - August 7, 1943. Editor GH, Sept. 6, 2026
HOW Beach was served by the 81st Canadian Flotillas of LCMs near Gallina.
GEORGE Beach is at the top of map, opposite the words 'Appendix A', at mod-
ern day Fontane Bianche. Map from a book of Canadian Navy and Comb. Ops
veterans' stories by D. Lewis, L. Birkenes, From St. Nazaire to Singapore,
the Canadian Amphibious War, 1941 - 1945, Volume 1
Map found in 'Allied Invasion of Sicily Museum WW2' in Catania
Canadian sailors lived in the cattle caves for 3 weeks in July, 1943
The photographs re Operation HUSKY from the Imperial War Museum continue:
A17917. Just after dawn men of the Highland Division are up to their waists in water
unloading stores from landing craft tanks. Meanwhile beach roads are being prepared
for heavy and light traffic during dawn of the opening day of the invasion of Sicily.
Lt. C.H. Parnall, RN Photographer, and IWM.
NA4715. Bofors anti-aircraft gun crew of 268 Battery, 40th LAA Regiment on alert,
16 July 1943. Photo - Sgt. Bourne, No. 2 Army F and P Unit and IWM.
NA5543. Operation Husky: An Airborne Division Horsa glider, after landing off
course nose down in a field near Syracuse. Although unsuccessful in achieving their
primary objectives, the Airborne forces did cause considerable disruption behind
the lines. Photo - Major G. Keating, No. 2 Army F & P Unit, and IWM.
Please link to Photographs: Imperial War Museum - Sicily, 1943 (3)
Unattributed Photos GH.















Photo NA 4065. Correction please. Troops shown in the picture are embarking from MALTA, not Tripoli.
ReplyDeleteHello to Joseph Spiteri. I have read the same information in the comment section at the well-visited, WW2 website "World War II Today". (Link - http://ww2today.com/4th-july-1943-a-great-invasion-armada-prepares-for-battle):
ReplyDeleteI.E., Denis A. Darmanin says:
That photo (with the caption - Troops embarking into landing craft at Tripoli for the invasion of Sicily, 3 July 1943.) was taken in Valletta, Malta.
The buildings at the rear are the old Bonded Stores at Pinto Wharf and the voided section is the bombed Flight to Egypt Chapel had stood, now rebuilt. Even some of those cannon bollards are still in use.
This photo is in Malta. Actually what is now referred to as the Valletta Waterfront.
Pinto Stores are in the background with the gap being the bombed Nativity Chapel. Some of those old cannon bollards are still there and in use.
I say that more information is required, such as good photographs of the background buildings that can be seen to be in Valetta Harbour. When I was in Inveraray, Scotland, a few years ago I snapped photos of the downtown (incl. a hotel my father visited while training just down the road) and my photos were almost 100% identical to WW2 photographs. I won't change the caption provided by Imperial War Museum but I will consider adding more information to reveal that the caption is challenged. I will also connect with another fellow who does in-depth research and see what he has to say about the matter.
Thank you for drawing the information to my attention.
Respectfully,
GH
I added new details (with a question or comment or two (re the caption by Lt. Chetwyn of photo NA4065 on September 6, 2026 and added a photo of the reverse side of the same photo, revealing the name of the photographer to be Lt Deakin, at the top of this post. The mistake may raise new questions in the minds of readers. I add my email address to the post with "Help Wanted" in mind. Editor GH
Delete